How The World Ends Live board →

All scenarios / Biological

Planet of the Apes

They're doing fine. They're not interested.

Evidence baseline0%
Snapshot rank#30 of 32
See the live number →

What it is

In Planet of the Apes, intelligent apes overthrow and replace humanity. It's a classic, and a sharp commentary on human arrogance.

Why it ranks where it does

In the real world, every species of great ape, including chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans, is endangered or critically endangered, mainly because of habitat loss, poaching and disease. They're losing ground, not gaining it. The score is zero.

Evidence on the board

What the experts say

Primatologists do study ape culture and tool use, which are remarkable, but nothing suggests a path toward ape civilization on any human timescale.

The movie vs. reality

The 1968 film and its reboots imagine apes gaining intelligence through evolution or, in the modern series, an experimental drug designed to treat Alzheimer's. Real intelligence evolves over hundreds of thousands to millions of years, and great apes reproduce slowly. Female chimpanzees and gorillas typically give birth only once every four to six years. Even with a lab-made boost, building a civilization requires language, writing and many generations of accumulated knowledge. The more realistic worry runs the other way: losing our closest living relatives to extinction this century.

What would move the number

Up

  • Apes developing writing (please let us know)

Down

  • Already at zero

Live signals we track

The baseline above is set from the evidence as of October 13, 2026. On the live board, your browser adjusts it in real time using these feeds. Chatter can only nudge a score in proportion to its evidence, so attention alone can't make an unlikely scenario look likely.

Sources

  1. Wikipedia: Great ape conservation
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_ape_conservation
  2. Wikipedia: Planet of the Apes
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_of_the_Apes

Baseline scores are an editorial threat index from 0 to 100 that combines current reporting with published expert estimates. They're meant for comparing risks, not as actuarial forecasts. See how the numbers work.